Friday, May 2, 2008

A Great Overview of the Megacity Phenomenon

I came across this nice video yesterday at the Business Week Web site. It's an interview with Siemens One President Ken Cornelius, in which he discusses some of the challenges and opportunities inherent in the increasing population of the world's cities, and the trend toward ever bigger cities.

Here's the video:



To boil it down to just two words: density works. It's a far more efficient way to use energy, has less impact on the environment, simplifies the provision of services, and involves far less infrastructure per capita. A far cry from the myth of natural, clean country living set in opposition to the dangerous, dirty city.

To me, the big question is not why cities are getter bigger and attracting ever bigger shares of the world's population, but rather why this isn't happening even more rapidly. The answer, at least in the United States, lies in the subtle ways that our suburban lifestyle is subsidized, hiding the true cost of our dispersed living patterns and the vast interior and exterior living spaces we view as a birthright. In other words, through the magic of tax dollar allocation, revenue produced by urban dwellers and companies is redirected in ways that subsidize the cost of providing power, sewage lines, communications, utilities and even transportation to those in far flung subdivisions.

If we ever want to fully realize the economic, environmental, and yes, social benefits that vibrant cities support, we have to ensure that the true cost of dispersed living is born by those who live that way.

1 comment:

EHS Director said...

Mark,

You make a valid point about the correlation between city population density and sustainability.

For ANY of our unicorn dreams of wind, solar, wave or mass transit to work... we
have to be closer together.

We lose over 50% of all energy in the process of distribution and conversion loss (EIA.gov). Smart grid and advanced storage options can only dream of closing this gap by 5-10% at most.

While just shifting 1/4 of population to dense towns would make area land and energy waste drop over 40%.

No tech... just healthy, walkable, friendly communities (i.e. end suicideburbia's)

I proposed this this idea to 'google last year'... but it appears they decided to go with the hightech, PR and subsidies route. All unsustainable by design.

I also saw this 'rural urban' in Canada I thought you would enjoy.
http://freshome.com/2010/03/28/habitat-67-an-icon-of-permanent-modernity/


With a few hydro, wind and solar mods this area would be awesome ;-)

Thanks for getting involved. Stay with it, we have a long road ahead. -Haase
 
P.S.
Check out bucky fuller at peak energy for for some other great sustainable urban ideas.
Great ideas never die, they only get rejected by congress ;-(